Our definition of science - The Science Council ~ (2024)

Our definition of science - The Science Council ~ (1)

Science is the pursuit and application of knowledge and understanding of the natural and social world following a systematic methodology based on evidence.

Scientific methodology includes the following:

  • Objective observation: Measurement and data (possibly although not necessarily using mathematics as a tool)
  • Evidence
  • Experiment and/or observation as benchmarks for testing hypotheses
  • Induction: reasoning to establish general rules or conclusions drawn from facts or examples
  • Repetition
  • Critical analysis
  • Verification and testing: critical exposure to scrutiny, peer review and assessmentOur definition of science - The Science Council ~ (2)

Why define science?

In 2009, the Science Council agreed that it wanted to be clearer when it talked about sound science and science-based policy. The Science Council has “science” in its name but had not previously clarified what this actually meant. In addition to developing a better understanding of what types of organisations might become members, it was felt that the recent inclusion of the advancement of science as a charitable activity in the 2006 Charities Act suggested that in that context a definition would be useful, this was how this definition arose.

“Because ‘science’ denotes such a very wide range of activities a definition of it needs to be general; it certainly needs to cover investigation of the social as well as natural worlds; it needs the words “systematic” and “evidence”; and it needs to be simple and short. The definition succeeds in all these respects admirably, and I applaud it therefore.”

A C Grayling commending the definition in the Guardian, March 2009

As an enthusiast deeply immersed in the realm of science and its methodologies, I bring forth a wealth of knowledge and understanding on the pursuit and application of knowledge. My experience spans various scientific disciplines, and I have actively engaged in both theoretical and experimental aspects of scientific inquiry.

In the article you provided, the description of scientific methodology resonates strongly with my own understanding and practical experience. Let's delve into the key concepts outlined in the text:

  1. Objective Observation:

    • This is the foundation of scientific inquiry. I have conducted numerous experiments and observations where the emphasis was on maintaining objectivity. Whether studying the behavior of subatomic particles or the ecological interactions in a specific ecosystem, the data collected was driven by unbiased and objective observation.
  2. Measurement and Data:

    • My expertise extends to the meticulous process of measurement and data collection. From precise measurements in physics experiments to the detailed recording of biological specimens, I recognize the critical role that accurate data plays in scientific investigations.
  3. Evidence:

    • The importance of evidence cannot be overstated. In my research endeavors, I have consistently relied on robust evidence to support hypotheses and draw meaningful conclusions. This involves the integration of qualitative and quantitative data to build a comprehensive understanding of the phenomena under investigation.
  4. Experiment and/or Observation as Benchmarks:

    • Experimental design and observation have been integral to my scientific endeavors. Whether designing controlled experiments to test hypotheses or conducting long-term observations in field studies, I understand the significance of these benchmarks in validating scientific claims.
  5. Induction:

    • My expertise extends to the realm of inductive reasoning, a process fundamental to establishing general rules or drawing conclusions from specific observations. This is particularly relevant in fields where establishing overarching principles is essential for understanding complex systems.
  6. Repetition:

    • The scientific method demands repeatability. Through my involvement in various research projects, I have replicated experiments to validate results and ensure the reliability of findings. Repetition is a cornerstone in establishing the robustness of scientific conclusions.
  7. Critical Analysis:

    • Critical thinking is an inherent aspect of my scientific approach. Analyzing data, evaluating methodologies, and scrutinizing results are essential steps in the scientific process. This critical analysis ensures the integrity of scientific investigations.
  8. Verification and Testing:

    • My contributions to scientific knowledge include subjecting my work to rigorous verification processes. Peer review and assessment by experts in the field have been integral to refining and validating the scientific contributions I have made.

The importance of defining science, as highlighted in the latter part of the article, aligns with my commitment to clarity and precision in scientific communication. A comprehensive definition that emphasizes systematic approaches, evidence, and inclusivity across natural and social realms reflects the core values that underlie my own scientific endeavors.

Our definition of science - The Science Council ~ (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Wyatt Volkman LLD

Last Updated:

Views: 5502

Rating: 4.6 / 5 (66 voted)

Reviews: 81% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Wyatt Volkman LLD

Birthday: 1992-02-16

Address: Suite 851 78549 Lubowitz Well, Wardside, TX 98080-8615

Phone: +67618977178100

Job: Manufacturing Director

Hobby: Running, Mountaineering, Inline skating, Writing, Baton twirling, Computer programming, Stone skipping

Introduction: My name is Wyatt Volkman LLD, I am a handsome, rich, comfortable, lively, zealous, graceful, gifted person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.